Board Thread:Dragon City Wiki/@comment-5354013-20140506150910/@comment-10090661-20140507011947

Well. Let's get this over with.


 * ...  Last month he forced me to go on vacation against my will. ...


 * 1) Untrue. See Thread:188266 that predates her "forced" vacation.


 * ... He demoted me and banned me for a week for no valid reason. ...


 * 1) She's addicted. She keeps telling the rest of the Admin team that she is tired, that her eyes are "bleeding" and so on, but she still keeps coming back. I removed her ability to do anything in the DCW so that she would be on vacation (because her eyes are "bleeding"), rather than still posting and answering questions after her vacation announcement.
 * 2) There was no demotion -- she was still "green".
 * 3) There was no demotion -- she was still in our FB groups and pages.
 * 4) Is a week too long for a vacation?


 * I contacted wikia who advised me to share this information with you, the community and ask for a vote.


 * 1) Without the certified content of that information, we cannot determine if the information is correct. Much of this thread's starter post is POV information.


 * Before I could come back, I had some problems with my computer.


 * 1) The computer problem has totally nothing to do with me.


 * I got my computer back yesterday and


 * 1) Again nothing to do with me.


 * CBR demoted me again


 * 1) Correction -- for the first time.


 * and banned me for disagreeing with him.


 * 1) Correction -- Rianza33 is banned for subversive behaviour. This thread is a good example.
 * 2) As subversive behaviour is possibly by itself not a problem, repeated acts of subversion is. DCW Members do not need to agree with opinions, methods or, in fact, anything from Admins/Bureaucrats, there needs to be a limit. Rianza33 has exceeded this limit. In fact, she exceeded this limit at the point of Thread:175615, which she kindly provided a link to in her post. All points in that thread are in fact part of the page linked by Jens Ingels, and were there before Thread:175615 was created.


 * This is totally against Wikia rules and policies.


 * 1) POV (Point-Of-View), unless Rianza33 is kind enough to provide links to the ones in question.


 * You can't just demote someone because they don't agree with you.


 * 1) Again, POV. Rianza33 is in fact asking the community to support a request based on POV, which is in fact the opposite of healthy.


 * He stated he was "firing me because I was too strongheaded".


 * 1) Links, please. This is probably more of quoting out of context again.


 * This is all because I said we are supposed to support our users,


 * 1) Agreed


 * not Jens Ingels the adopted founder of our wiki.


 * 1) Disagree, unless Jens Ingels' direction runs counter to the DCW's. Please show that it does, before implying that we are not to support Jens' direction.


 * I support what Jens has created here, but I am doing all this work for the users of our DCW Community.


 * 1) All I see is that Rianza33 supports whatever she wishes to, and refuses to accept any requests or even orders counter to her desire.
 * 2) My POV is that she does all the work because she's addicted, not because she loves the DCW community.


 * This is what CBR terms "subversive behavior".


 * 1) Incorrect. This thread is what I term subversive behaviour.


 * The only difference between an admin and a bureaucrat is a bureaucrat has the power to promote and demote someone.


 * 1) POV. Power, no. Responsibility, yes.
 * 2) The fact that Rianza33 calls it power illustrates how she views the ability.


 * They are not supposed to do this unilaterally, which is what CBR did.


 * 1) Nic.nex, the Bureaucrat that demoted Pivato did this unilaterally. Rianza33 agreed with his decision in his after-the-fact announcement. The same Bureaucrat unbanned Rianza33.
 * 2) I will admit I was a little forceful in one way -- in getting the other Admins to agree to Rianza33's "elevation" to Adminship. It is therefore my responsibility to correct my mistake.


 * He also banned me for no reason whatsoever except to keep me from contacting anyone.


 * 1) POV. I banned Rianza33 to avoid more subversive behaviour like this thread.


 * Fortunately another bureaucrat un banned me.


 * 1) POV.


 * As a community, we have the right to choose our admins and bureaucrats.


 * 1) True. However we do prefer our DCW Admins to be able to contribute, rather than merely popular -- this is why we screen applicants.
 * 2) The DCW is open to editing by Members. Only game data is limited to Admins who are shown how to maintain our database. Templates are also open to editing, creation of Templates are open to Members -- except critical Templates and the Data namespace that are editable by Admins only.

Note

 * 1) Members are able to edit ALL pages.
 * 2) Rianza33 is unbanned. I will not be re-banning her unless there is cause, e.g., more subversion.
 * 3) What reason is there for this petition? She's just after revenge.

-- remainder of quote deleted for irrelevance --